Last week I fixed the last change from review feedback and landed the V3D (vc5/6 kernel DRM driver) to drm-misc-next. This means, unless something exceptional happens, it’ll be in kernel 4.18. I also sent out a patch series renaming the Mesa driver to V3D as well.
For VC4, I landed Stefan Schake’s syncobj patches in the kernel. Once that makes its way to drm-next, we can merge the Mesa side (EGL_ANDROID_native_fence_sync extension) and I believe get out-of-the-box Android HWC2 support.
I also merged a couple of old DSI patches of mine that got reviewed, my DPI regression fix, and a fix from Boris for a (valid) warning that was happening about the MADVISE refcounting versus async pageflips.
Boris has been busy working on adding display properties for TV underscan. Many HDMI monitors emulate old TV style scanout where, despite being 1920x1080 pixels, they read from a smaller area of their input and scale up. HDMI has infoframes to tell the TV whether the input is formatted for that old style scanout or not (as a desktop, we would always want them to scan out 1:1), but since the HDMI conformance tests didn’t check it, most old HDMI TVs don’t change behavior on that input and just always underscan (or you have to dig around in menus to get 1:1. The overscan property on the closed source firmware configures the HVS to scale the 1920x1080 desktop down to the region that the TV will scale back up. Display will look bad, but it’s better than losing your menu bars off the edge of the screen. Once we collectively decide what the new KMS property should be, Boris’s patches should let people replicate this workaround in the KMS world.
Boris has also been working on patch series to get VC4 to work with the DSI display in the DT, whether or not the DSI display is actually connected. We need this if we want to avoid having additional closed source firmware code hacking up the DT based on its own probing of the DSI display. His new series seems to have a chance of getting past both DT, panel, and bridge maintainers, but I have honestly lost count of what iteration of probing behavior we’re on for this device (I think it’s around 10 variations, though). It was all working at one point, before DT review requirements wrecked it.